Alvarez & Marsal’s South Carolina Department of Education School District Efficiency Review
The reviews contain observations and recommendations completed in conjunction with the School Efficiency Review conducted for the South Carolina Department of Education and pursuant to the FY2016-17 General Appropriations Act.
A&M conducted School Efficiency Reviews of 79 of the 82 school districts in the State across two phases, each of which approximated nine weeks. Phase 1 included 32 districts (all Plaintiff districts) and Phase 2 included 47 districts. Three districts did not participate due to previously completed efficiency reports: Clarendon 1 (Plaintiff), Lexington 4 (Plaintiff) and Dorchester Two.
- State Efficiency Review
The Alvarez & Marsal’s South Carolina Department of Education State Efficiency Review. This review contains observations and recommendations completed in conjunction with the School Efficiency Review conducted for the South Carolina Department of Education and pursuant to the FY2016-17 General Appropriations Act.
South Carolina Department of Education School District Efficiency Reviews by Alvarez & Marsal
The reviews contain observations and recommendations completed in conjunction with the School Efficiency Review conducted for the South Carolina Department of Education and pursuant to the FY2016-17 General Appropriations Act.
A&M conducted School Efficiency Reviews of 79 of the 82 school districts in the State across two phases, each of which approximated nine weeks. Phase 1 included 32 districts (all Plaintiff districts) and Phase 2 included 47 districts. Three districts did not participate due to previously completed efficiency reports: Clarendon 1 (Plaintiff), Lexington 4 (Plaintiff) and Dorchester Two.
