ESEA District

2014 - ESEA / Federal Accountability System

KEY Index Score Grade Description
  90-100 A Performance substantially exceeds the state's expectations.
  80-89.9 B Performance exceeds the state's expectations.
  70-79.9 C Performance meets the state's expectations.
  60-69.9 D Performance does not meet the state's expectations.
  Less than 60 F Performance is substantially below the state's expectations.
  Blank * Insufficient data available to calculate an ESEA grade.

2014 Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)
  Elementary
School
Middle
School
High
School
English Language Arts (ELA) 640 632 229
Math 640 632 226
Science / Biology 640 632 78
Social Studies / History 640 632 75
ELA - Percent Tested 95 95 95
Math - Percent Tested 95 95 95
Graduation Rate N/A N/A 75.1
ORANGEBURG 5


ORANGEBURG 5 > DISTRICT


Overall Scores
Overall Weighted Points Total 69.4
Overall Grade Conversion D
   
Points Total - Elementary Grades 73.5
Points Total - Middle Grades 64.6
Points Total - High School Grades 70.6

 

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MATRIX

Matrix Key
1 = Met State Objective
0 = Did not meet State Objective
0.6-0.9 = Level of proximity to the AMO (quartile between proficient and AMO)
0.1-0.5 = Level of Improvement between previous year and current year

MIDDLE SCHOOL MATRIX




TITLE

ELA
Proficiency
Met/Improved

Math
Proficiency
Met/Improved

Science
Proficiency
Met/Improved
Social
Studies
Proficiency
Met/Improved

ELA
Percent
Tested

Math
Percent
Tested
ALL STUDENTS 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.9 1 1
Male 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 1 1
Female 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.9 1 1
White 1 0.9 0.9 1 1 1
African-American 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.9 1 1
Asian / Pacific Islander
Hispanic 0.7 0.8 1 1
American Indian / Alaskan
Disabled 0 0 0 0.2 1 1
LEP 0.8 1 0.9 1 1
Subsidized Meals 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 1 1

           
Total Number of Points 6.4 6.3 5 5.5 9 9
Total Number of Objectives 9 9 8 7 9 9
Percent of Objectives Met 71.11 70 62.5 78.57 100 100
Weight 0.4 0.4 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Weighted Points Subtotal 28.44 28 3.13 3.93 5 5
Points Total 73.5

Matrix Key
1 = Met State Objective
0 = Did not meet State Objective
0.6-0.9 = Level of proximity to the AMO (quartile between proficient and AMO)
0.1-0.5 = Level of Improvement between previous year and current year

HIGH SCHOOL MATRIX




TITLE

ELA
Proficiency
Met/Improved

Math
Proficiency
Met/Improved

Science
Proficiency
Met/Improved
Social
Studies
Proficiency
Met/Improved

ELA
Percent
Tested

Math
Percent
Tested
ALL STUDENTS 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1
Male 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 1 1
Female 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1
White 0.9 0.8 1 1 1 1
African-American 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 1 1
Asian / Pacific Islander
Hispanic
American Indian / Alaskan
Disabled 0 0.1 0.5 0.2 1 1
LEP
Subsidized Meals 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 1 1

           
Total Number of Points 4.1 4.1 5.2 5.6 7 7
Total Number of Objectives 7 7 7 7 7 7
Percent of Objectives Met 58.57 58.57 74.29 80 100 100
Weight 0.4 0.4 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Weighted Points Subtotal 23.43 23.43 3.71 4 5 5
Points Total 64.6

Matrix Key
1 = Met State Objective
0 = Did not meet State Objective
0.6-0.9 = Level of proximity to the AMO (quartile between proficient and AMO)
0.1-0.5 = Level of Improvement between previous year and current year




TITLE

ELA
Proficiency
Met/Improved

Math
Proficiency
Met/Improved

Science
Proficiency
Met/Improved

History
Proficiency
Met/Improved

ELA
Percent
Tested

Math
Percent
Tested


Graduation
Rate
ALL STUDENTS 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 1 1 0.8
Male 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 1 1 0
Female 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.6 1 1 1
White 0.8 0.6 1 1 1
African-American 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.6 1 1 0.8
Asian / Pacific Islander
Hispanic
American Indian / Alaskan
Disabled 0.6 0 0 1 1 0
LEP
Subsidized Meals 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.3 1 1 0.8

           
Total Number of Points 5.6 4.1 3.4 2.7 7 7 4.4
Total Number of Objectives 7 7 6 5 7 7 7
Percent of Objectives Met 80 58.57 56.67 54 100 100 62.86
Weight 0.225 0.225 0.05 0.05 0.075 0.075 0.3
Weighted Points Subtotal 18 13.18 2.83 2.7 7.5 7.5 18.86
Points Total 70.6


Note:
SC-ALT scores were included in the calculations where appropriate.




ORANGEBURG 5 Schools

Select a school to view ESEA results for that location.