ESEA District

2013 - ESEA / Federal Accountability System

KEY Index Score Grade Description
  90-100 A Performance substantially exceeds the state's expectations.
  80-89.9 B Performance exceeds the state's expectations.
  70-79.9 C Performance meets the state's expectations.
  60-69.9 D Performance does not meet the state's expectations.
  Less than 60 F Performance is substantially below the state's expectations.
  Blank * Insufficient data available to calculate an ESEA grade.

2013 Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)
  Elementary
School
Middle
School
High
School
English Language Arts (ELA) 635 628 226
Math 635 628 223
Science / Biology 635 628 77
Social Studies / History 635 628 73
ELA - Percent Tested 95 95 95
Math - Percent Tested 95 95 95
Graduation Rate N/A N/A 74.1
ORANGEBURG 4


ORANGEBURG 4 > DISTRICT


Overall Scores
Overall Weighted Points Total 60.2
Overall Grade Conversion D
   
Points Total - Elementary Grades 49.6
Points Total - Middle Grades 66.7
Points Total - High School Grades 71.4

 

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MATRIX

Matrix Key
1 = Met State Objective
0 = Did not meet State Objective
0.1-0.9 = Level of Improvement between previous year and current year

MIDDLE SCHOOL MATRIX




TITLE

ELA
Proficiency
Met/Improved

Math
Proficiency
Met/Improved

Science
Proficiency
Met/Improved
Social
Studies
Proficiency
Met/Improved

ELA
Percent
Tested

Math
Percent
Tested
ALL STUDENTS 1 0.2 0.4 0.3 1 1
Male 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.3 1 1
Female 1 0 0 0.3 1 1
White 1 1 0.8 0.2 1 1
African-American 0.5 0 0 0.4 1 1
Asian / Pacific Islander
Hispanic 0 0 0 0 1 1
American Indian / Alaskan
Disabled 0 0.1 0 0 1 1
LEP
Subsidized Meals 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.4 1 1

           
Total Number of Points 4.4 1.8 2.1 1.9 8 8
Total Number of Objectives 8 8 8 8 8 8
Percent of Objectives Met 55 22.5 26.25 23.75 100 100
Weight 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.1
Weighted Points Subtotal 19.25 7.88 1.31 1.19 10 10
Points Total 49.6

Matrix Key
1 = Met State Objective
0 = Did not meet State Objective
0.1-0.9 = Level of Improvement between previous year and current year

HIGH SCHOOL MATRIX




TITLE

ELA
Proficiency
Met/Improved

Math
Proficiency
Met/Improved

Science
Proficiency
Met/Improved
Social
Studies
Proficiency
Met/Improved

ELA
Percent
Tested

Math
Percent
Tested
ALL STUDENTS 1 1 0 0.2 1 1
Male 1 1 0 1 1 1
Female 1 0 0 0 1 1
White 1 1 1 1 1 1
African-American 0.8 0 0 0.4 1 1
Asian / Pacific Islander
Hispanic
American Indian / Alaskan
Disabled 0.3 0 0 0.5 1 1
LEP
Subsidized Meals 0.6 0 0 0.4 1 1

           
Total Number of Points 5.7 3 1 3.5 7 7
Total Number of Objectives 7 7 7 7 7 7
Percent of Objectives Met 81.43 42.86 14.29 50 100 100
Weight 0.35 0.35 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.1
Weighted Points Subtotal 28.5 15 0.71 2.5 10 10
Points Total 66.7

Matrix Key
1 = Met State Objective
0 = Did not meet State Objective
0.1-0.9 = Level of Improvement between previous year and current year




TITLE

ELA
Proficiency
Met/Improved

Math
Proficiency
Met/Improved

Science
Proficiency
Met/Improved

History
Proficiency
Met/Improved

ELA
Percent
Tested

Math
Percent
Tested


Graduation
Rate
ALL STUDENTS 1 0 0.6 0.1 1 1 1
Male 1 1 0.8 0 1 1 0.7
Female 1 0 0.4 0.2 1 1 1
White 1 1 1 0.2 1 1 1
African-American 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.1 1 1 1
Asian / Pacific Islander
Hispanic
American Indian / Alaskan
Disabled 0.9
LEP
Subsidized Meals 0.2 0 0.3 0.1 1 1 0.9

           
Total Number of Points 4.6 2.1 3.4 0.7 6 6 6.5
Total Number of Objectives 6 6 6 6 6 6 7
Percent of Objectives Met 76.67 35 56.67 11.67 100 100 92.86
Weight 0.225 0.225 0.05 0.05 0.075 0.075 0.3
Weighted Points Subtotal 17.25 7.88 2.83 0.58 7.5 7.5 27.86
Points Total 71.4


Note:
SC-ALT scores were included in the calculations where appropriate.




ORANGEBURG 4 Schools

Select a school to view ESEA results for that location.