2013 - ESEA / Federal Accountability System

KEY	Index Score	Grade	Description
	90-100	A	Performance substantially exceeds the state's expectations.
	80-89.9	B	Performance exceeds the state's expectations.
	70-79.9	C	Performance meets the state's expectations.
	60-69.9	D	Performance does not meet the state's expectations.
	Less than 60	F	Performance is substantially below the state's expectations.
	Blank	*	Insufficient data available to calculate an ESEA grade.

2013 Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)

	Elementary School	Middle School	High School
English Language Arts (ELA)	635	628	226
Math	635	628	223
Science / Biology	635	628	77
Social Studies / History	635	628	73
ELA - Percent Tested	95	95	95
Math - Percent Tested	95	95	95
Graduation Rate	N/A	N/A	74.1

FLORENCE 4


FLORENCE 4 > DISTRICT

Overall	Scores
Overall Weighted Points Total	47
Overall Grade Conversion	F
Points Total - Elementary Grades	34.5
Points Total - Middle Grades	64.2
Points Total - High School Grades	24.5

 

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MATRIX

Matrix Key
1 = Met State Objective
0 = Did not meet State Objective
0.1-0.9 = Level of Improvement between previous year and current year

MIDDLE SCHOOL MATRIX

TITLE	ELA Proficiency Met/Improved	Math Proficiency Met/Improved	Science Proficiency Met/Improved	Social Studies Proficiency Met/Improved	ELA Percent Tested	Math Percent Tested
ALL STUDENTS	0.3	0	0	0.3	1	1
Male	0	0	0	0.6	0	1
Female	0.9	0	0	0	1	1
White
African-American	0.2	0	0	0.1	1	1
Asian / Pacific Islander
Hispanic
American Indian / Alaskan
Disabled
LEP
Subsidized Meals	0.8	0	0	0.1	1	1
Total Number of Points	2.2	0	0	1.1	4	5
Total Number of Objectives	5	5	5	5	5	5
Percent of Objectives Met	44	0	0	22	80	100
Weight	0.35	0.35	0.05	0.05	0.1	0.1
Weighted Points Subtotal	15.4	0	0	1.1	8	10
Points Total	34.5

Matrix Key
1 = Met State Objective
0 = Did not meet State Objective
0.1-0.9 = Level of Improvement between previous year and current year

HIGH SCHOOL MATRIX

TITLE	ELA Proficiency Met/Improved	Math Proficiency Met/Improved	Science Proficiency Met/Improved	Social Studies Proficiency Met/Improved	ELA Percent Tested	Math Percent Tested
ALL STUDENTS	0.9	0.2	0.9	0.4	1	1
Male	0.9	0.7	0.9	0	1	1
Female	0.8	0	0.3	0.8	1	1
White
African-American	0.9	0.1	0.9	0.3	1	1
Asian / Pacific Islander
Hispanic
American Indian / Alaskan
Disabled
LEP
Subsidized Meals	0.9	0.1	0.9	0.3	1	1
Total Number of Points	4.4	1.1	3.9	1.8	5	5
Total Number of Objectives	5	5	5	5	5	5
Percent of Objectives Met	88	22	78	36	100	100
Weight	0.35	0.35	0.05	0.05	0.1	0.1
Weighted Points Subtotal	30.8	7.7	3.9	1.8	10	10
Points Total	64.2

Matrix Key
1 = Met State Objective
0 = Did not meet State Objective
0.1-0.9 = Level of Improvement between previous year and current year

TITLE	ELA Proficiency Met/Improved	Math Proficiency Met/Improved	Science Proficiency Met/Improved	History Proficiency Met/Improved	ELA Percent Tested	Math Percent Tested	Graduation Rate
ALL STUDENTS	0	0	0.4	0.1	1	1	0
Male							0
Female							1
White
African-American	0	0			1	1	0
Asian / Pacific Islander
Hispanic
American Indian / Alaskan
Disabled
LEP
Subsidized Meals	0	0	0.8	0.1	1	1	0
Total Number of Points	0	0	1.2	0.2	3	3	1
Total Number of Objectives	3	3	2	2	3	3	5
Percent of Objectives Met	0	0	60	10	100	100	20
Weight	0.225	0.225	0.05	0.05	0.075	0.075	0.3
Weighted Points Subtotal	0	0	3	0.5	7.5	7.5	6
Points Total	24.5

Note:
SC-ALT scores were included in the calculations where appropriate.

FLORENCE 4 Schools

Select a school to view ESEA results for that location.