District ESEA

ESEA District

Index Score	Grade	Description
90-100	A	Performance substantially exceeds the state's expectations.
80-89.9	B	Performance exceeds the state's expectations.
70-79.9	C	Performance meets the state's expectations.
60-69.9	D	Performance does not meet the state's expectations.
Less than 60	F	Performance is substantially below the state's expectations.
Blank	*	Insufficient data available to calculate an ESEA grade.

2013 Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)

FLORENCE 3

FLORENCE 3 > DISTRICT

Overall	Scores
Overall Weighted Points Total	57.6
Overall Grade Conversion	F

Points Total - Elementary Grades	55.4
Points Total - Middle Grades	57.7
Points Total - High School Grades	67

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MATRIX

Matrix Key
1 = Met State Objective
0 = Did not meet State Objective
0.1-0.9 = Level of Improvement between previous year and current year

MIDDLE SCHOOL MATRIX

TITLE	ELA Proficiency Met/Improved	Math Proficiency Met/Improved	Science Proficiency Met/Improved	Social Studies Proficiency Met/Improved	ELA Percent Tested	Math Percent Tested
ALL STUDENTS	1	0	0	0.9	1	1
Male	1	0	0.4	0.9	1	1
Female	1	0	0	0.7	1	1
White	1	1	0	0.9	1	1
African-American	1	0	0.1	0.9	1	1
Asian / Pacific Islander
Hispanic	1	0	0.9	0.3	1	1
American Indian / Alaskan
Disabled	0.1	0	0	0.3	1	1
LEP	0	0	0	0	1	1
Subsidized Meals	1	0	0	0.8	1	1

Total Number of Points	7.1	1	1.4	5.7	9	9
Total Number of Objectives	9	9	9	9	9	9
Percent of Objectives Met	78.89	11.11	15.56	63.33	100	100
Weight	0.35	0.35	0.05	0.05	0.1	0.1
Weighted Points Subtotal	27.61	3.89	0.78	3.17	10	10
Points Total	55.4

Matrix Key
1 = Met State Objective
0 = Did not meet State Objective
0.1-0.9 = Level of Improvement between previous year and current year

HIGH SCHOOL MATRIX

TITLE	ELA Proficiency Met/Improved	Math Proficiency Met/Improved	Science Proficiency Met/Improved	Social Studies Proficiency Met/Improved	ELA Percent Tested	Math Percent Tested
ALL STUDENTS	1	0	0	0	1	1
Male	0.2	0	0.1	0	1	1
Female	1	1	0	0	1	1
White	1	1	0	1	1	1
African-American	0.5	0	0.2	0	1	1
Asian / Pacific Islander
Hispanic
American Indian / Alaskan
Disabled	0.9	0.4	0.3	0	1	1
LEP
Subsidized Meals	0.3	0	0.1	0	1	1

Total Number of Points	4.9	2.4	0.7	1	7	7
Total Number of Objectives	7	7	7	7	7	7
Percent of Objectives Met	70	34.29	10	14.29	100	100
Weight	0.35	0.35	0.05	0.05	0.1	0.1
Weighted Points Subtotal	24.5	12	0.5	0.71	10	10
Points Total	57.7

Matrix Key
1 = Met State Objective
0 = Did not meet State Objective
0.1-0.9 = Level of Improvement between previous year and current year

TITLE	ELA Proficiency Met/Improved	Math Proficiency Met/Improved	Science Proficiency Met/Improved	History Proficiency Met/Improved	ELA Percent Tested	Math Percent Tested	Graduation Rate
ALL STUDENTS	0.4	1	0.1	0.1	1	1	1
Male	0.3	0	0.1	0.2	1	1	1
Female	1	1	0	0	1	1	1
White	1	1	1	0.1	1	1	1
African-American	0.4	0.2	0.2	0	1	1	1
Asian / Pacific Islander
Hispanic
American Indian / Alaskan
Disabled			0				0.1
LEP
Subsidized Meals	0.2	0	0.2	0	1	1	1

Total Number of Points	3.3	3.2	1.6	0.4	6	6	6.1
Total Number of Objectives	6	6	7	6	6	6	7
Percent of Objectives Met	55	53.33	22.86	6.67	100	100	87.14
Weight	0.225	0.225	0.05	0.05	0.075	0.075	0.3
Weighted Points Subtotal	12.38	12	1.14	0.33	7.5	7.5	26.14
Points Total	67

Note:
SC-ALT scores were included in the calculations where appropriate.

Select a school to view ESEA results for that location.